I for one think Halo 3 is more fun to play than Reach. There is obviously lots of flaws in both games, but I don't have such a hard time coping with them in Halo 3.

Halo 3 is the worst online multiplayer experience since W@W. Campaign wise it's the worst in the story, having a predictable plot and boring gameplay/scenes with little to no variation from the past campaigns, lacking some in some cases.

It lacked good methods to forge or make maps along with extras like FF. So no. Gaylo 3 is not better then reach.

Personally i think that h3 is better. I enjoy the new features in reach to a degree,but overall i like the h3 multiplayer experience much better.

EDIT: After playing Reach for a while, i think i like it more then h3. Anyways im down or some h3 and hr customs anytime. Gt: Sportsmaster416 add meh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pv1jR7NLQM0&feature=sub

Gt: iSeannn 412 add for h3/hr customs

H3 is definitely better, for now.

How is H3 better then Reach, please explain...

it's better in my opinion because i'm used to the shit that happens in that game. reach is going to take a bit longer for me to adapt to but hey, that's what new games are always like. apparently hating on h3 is the cool thing to do on this forum, but to each his own i guess.

H3 is the laughing stock of the series.

The only thing it's got on Reach is the Battle Rifle, and that's a bitter sweet compliment considering the Halo 2 Battle Rifle owns H3.

It escapes me how someone can enjoy H3 more then Reach. Let alone, enjoy it at all.

It was a lot more fun, and a lot less frustrating. Most people like H2 better because that's their first game they loved, well for me its Spyro the Dragon.


Spyro beats Halo.

I like Animal Crossing. It's better than both H3 and Reach.

I can't decide between H3 or Reach this early.

This is a great thread, now everyone can point and laugh at who actually like H3.