|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
|
I personally think Reach is a lot better with NBNS, but I still think it doesn't feel like Halo. I don't know if its because I don't have Chief jumping up ten feet in the air while floating like a bird in the wind or what. Not only that, but I miss all of the neat little jumps you used to be able to do. I feel Bungie cleaned up the game so well that there were no more jumps like G1 to G2 on Guardian or the S1 to S3 on Guardian. That's the stuff that really separated the good players from the great players and allowed for out "maneuvering" of your opponents.
|
|
Reach is NOT Halo. Halo is about skill and creativity. Its about having simple fun. It is NOT about jetpacks, armor lock, sprinting...etc. And a one shot dmr with reticle bloom? Hmmm, am I playing halo or COD? Halo 4 better have a BR and take out all of the annoying extras they threw into reach or the series is done for good.
|
|
hi
|
|
good
|
|
I personally think H3 is the better game overall. The H3 ranking system was so simple and yes it had some problems but you eventually got over them. I always liked the halo series over the CoD series because everyone was equal and the only differentiation was skill, not perks or things like a jet pack or an armour lockup. Halo reach felt less like Halo simply because it was the first halo game to be made like it was. I'm really hoping 343 studios makes halo 4 like halo 3/2. Otherwise, I will be very disappointed (not that the would care haha).
|
|
Halo 3 is not that bad but for some reason I like Reach over Halo 3 but only multiplayer wise
|
|
WOW, everyone is hating on H3. H3 was and still is ten times better than reach. Halo reach isn't even halo, not with its gay loadouts, Horrible primary weapon(DMR), cartoon looking graphics, and cheap armor abilities. the only people who liked reach are babies who dont know shit about halo and the people who were shit at H2 and H3 (games that took skill).
|
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|